It was a tweet from Olivier Blanchard, emeritus professor of economics at MIT and former chief economist of the IMF, that first drew my attention to the book
Blanchard’s full blurb reads
“A brilliant and fascinating description of crypto. It makes painfully clear that, on the buying side, there is no limit to human credulity, and the faith in magic returns. And, on the selling side, no limit to hubris, deception and scamming. Read the book, and cry.”
As I sat reading the book yesterday I kept wondering quite how it had got through the publishers’ lawyers. But it seems to have been written under a pseudonym and various significant names have been changed, including that of the UK-based crypto firm (that briefly became one of the biggest crypto marketing companies around) in which the author was a senior figure, and more than a few of their client firms. Presumably that was seen as enough to reduce the legal risks sufficiently to publish.
Readers should be grateful: it is an easy and absorbing read, and if you are anything like me you’ll read it with some mix of astonishment, despair (human nature and all that), and moral outrage. I’m pretty sure the author intends to prompt readers to think more regulation is an obvious and necessary response, but I’m less easily persuaded on that count. Fools and their money…. If there are decent people and firms in the sector, operating consistently ethically, there is pretty strong incentive on them to differentiate themselves from the (apparently) very many rogues and rank opportunists.
“Donoghue” (from here on I’ll drop the quote marks) – who seems to be still quite young (says he was still a student in 2016) – had a background in PR, apparently in both finance and politics in the UK, before he jumped aboard a crypto startup being put together by an old university friend and the friend’s cousin. In the early days – Donoghue still holding down a fulltime PR job elsewhere – it seems not to have been much more than three or four of them, chasing the dream of “generational wealth”. The plan was to launch a gambling platform – on the future price of Bitcoin – with an associated crypto token. As Donoghue writes it now – while claiming, perhaps plausibly as he was the PR guy, not to have realised it at the time – it was a “totally implausible business model”. Which, in the crypto sector, didn’t stop lots of weird projects getting off the ground, and a lot of wealth being redistributed (and some apparently made – with an emphasis on the “apparently”; it was close to the sort of stuff J K Galbraith was writing about when he coined the phrase “the bezzle”). The shortlived boom Donoghue was in the midst of collapsed in late 2022, most prominently including the fall of Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX.
It is a lively story. Donoghue’s firm started with its own platform/token, but very quickly found that there was more money to be made parleying their experiences and expertise (such as it was) into selling marketing and promotional services around the launch of new crypto firms/products/token to the myriad of other ambitious opportunists wanting to get on the boom quickly. In some cases, firms were almost throwing money at Moonshot (the pseudonym of the advisory firm). There are weird tales of the launch of improbable NFTs (non-fungible tokens) – who, they wondered, was going to want to buy NFTs of pictures of the football players of some US team, whose CFO had got keen on the idea, especially when there was no easy way – for those not already engrossed in the crypto world – to buy the product. But it sold. Or an NFT of a stamp, when one could simply own the stamp itself (as I recall it, that one didn’t get off the ground).
There are plenty of accounts of “influencers” being paid in heavily discounted crypto tokens they were to hawk, never disclosing to the influenced their own direct stake in the success of the token/platform. Or of venture capital firms issued with deeply discounted tokens, typically undertaking next to no due diligence, and wanted less for the immediate money they provided, than for the apparent (but highly misleading signal) that if the VCs were on board, it must be okay for the public to buy. And the parties, so many parties, so lavish.
In Donoghue’s words:
It’s an insider’s view, into the lives and livelihoods of some of the inner circle to which I used to belong. It’s a record of the sheer extravagance, excess and absurdity, which seemed to take place on a daily basis. And what it illustrates is how the people behind one of the most captivating, disruptive and incomprehensible industries the world has ever seen act when the cameras are off, and their guards are down.
I strongly recommend the book. And if the recommendation of someone like Blanchard (and blurbs from two Nobel memorial prize in economics winners) isn’t the thing for you, it also comes blurbed by people like Frank Abagnale (subject of Catch Me if You Can), Izabella Kaminska, Frank Partnoy, William Cohan and Dan Davies, authors many of you will recognise. Oh, and by Andy Verity, whose excellent book – published by the same firm – on the scandalous prosecutions that followed the LIBOR issues in 2008/09 I wrote about here last year.
As it happened I had a couple of emails from Donoghue himself a couple of weeks ago offering me a review copy (not sure why, this being a fairly obscure blog, but I guess PR was his expertise. And I’d already ordered a copy). This is how he describes his own book.
The book is a narrative non-fiction account of my time spent working in the cryptocurrency industry. It’s a cautionary tale of the scams and fraud endemic to the space, and the often-devastating consequences inflicted on ordinary investors who get caught up in these.
For several years, I ran one of the most prominent marketing agencies in the industry, working with some of the largest companies and projects in the space. I was also on the founding team of a number of projects myself, one of which obtained an all-time-high fully diluted market capitalisation of $300 million.
My book now seeks to shed light on the corruption and malpractice which I saw unfold on a daily basis.
What could usefully be added is the line from the end of the book’s Prologue: “In order to tell that story, I first need to tell my own. It’s the story of a player on the inside who became so blinded by greed that he didn’t even realise he’d lost his way until it was almost too late”. It was a wild ride, and perhaps one he is now ashamed of. His penultimate paragraph is a good place to end.
I can only hope that, after the actions of SBF, Do Kwon, and the countless other characters in the rogues’ gallery of crypto we haven’t heard of – who will all hopefully get their day in court sooner rather than later – people will be dissuaded from having a punt in the murky and malevolent markets of crypto.
Thanks Michael,
I wish I had the time to read it, but with all the skull-duggery going on it is a challenge to even read a small %-age of collective ‘knowledge’ being disseminated, some of it fact and some of it pure fiction.
I’ve been both curious and suspicious of crypto. Curious because it promises to be a solution to the fiat currency (mis)managed by govt’s. The plusses are the fact that there is a limit on its supply, and govt can’t stop you form using it wherever you want or need to. However, a conversation with anyone who holds some of it quickly turns to: Look how much I’ve made!
Now either a) you’ve made some (+ve) and others have lost (-ve), because essentially it isn’t backed by anything (0), or b) it is just a ponzi scheme.
It makes more sense to put any spare cash into gold or silver at this stage.
In the meantime I’ve decided to move back to Africa. There is lots of exciting things happening there, with a huge move back to the country, out of the cities, and I expect it to accelerate as soon as the banks start offering loans again, which is coming. Yes, you have to take care of a lot more yourself, like your own security, and go through life with your eyes wide open, but it isn’t that hard.
Kind regards, Jan
LikeLike
All the best back in Africa Jan
LikeLike
The central bank’s economic monopoly is the biggest Ponzi scheme in the world.
Yes the central banksters are pushing their NWO crypto currency and trying to get people to agree to digitize themselves (ID) . Digital currency =Utter control by what is a tyranny.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Central banks have monopoly of the money supply within the country they issue currency in. They do this by creating new money for government spending and by regulating the commercial banks credit growth. This isn’t a Ponzi scheme it’s just the operational nature of a fiat currency and the currency is a utility that facilitates economic interactions in the most consistent and efficient way. Consider an economy without the utility of a fiat currency – what would economic activity look like? How would exchange take place across the different parts of the economy?
LikeLike
Central banks have monopoly of the money supply within all the countries they issue currency in.
They make up new money for government spending and the regulating of the commercial banks is a joke, they self regulate .
Commercial banks “lend” money into existence by creating loans. They do not have this money in their banks they simply have the “right” to create the loans.
In and of itself this is inherently inflationary even if they have the actual money deposited in their bank the interest on the loan has to be paid.
The same usury money lenders have been around since Jesus time of turning their tables over pre crucifixion .
Only banks have the right to create money in our current economic model. Why? Why is it that govts cant make it up without interest for infrastructure . That makes more sense.
Isn’t it time to start considering a return to true sovereign money creation that benefits all of the people instead of a handful of banksters.
John Keys resign as prime minister of New Zealand to take up the chairmanship of one of the largest banks. The separation between central banking and their corporate govt is a illusion , the govt operates as a debt creation scheme with taxpayers on the hook for debt with interest borrowed in their names.
The Reserve Bank follows orders from Basel not from government.
LikeLike
…but on a positive note though things seem chaotic and negative we are more than just human ( an ego mind driven by fear) we are more than Human we are Beings, human beings. And many are waking up from being totally identified with the conditioned mind, ironically the challenges are here to wake us up. The old dysfunctional systems and the dogma that supports it are crumbling.
LikeLike
Way back in the 00’s I worked with someone who was building computers to mine bitcoin in his home office. I haven’t kept in touch but whenever I read about bit coin I wonder if he stuck at it and is now a bitcoin millionaire.
Bitcoin discussions always make me think about what defines a currency and what defines a store of value. Roman soldiers used to be paid with bags of salt – which initially struck me as strange – but at the time salt was used to preserve food so was a significant asset in terms of anyone’s ability to survive and mitigate risks like famine etc. This made it easily tradable with probably nearly anyone across different sectors of the economy at that time. And in that sense was like a ‘commodity as currency’.
Bitcoin and gold – on the other other – are what I see as a store of value and both share many of the same properties – aside from volatility which is exclusive to Bitcoin. Both are essentially useless as resources in the real economy – they have to be converted into currency first. Both have very little utility – yes gold is used in jewelry and some electronics but for the most part it sits in vaults gathering dust. Both are worth whatever someone is willing to pay for them based on what exactly? No one knows.
Bitcoin does serve as a great model of the effect of artificially induced scarcity.
All the skullduggery (and its success) suggest a lot of investors and speculators with more money than they need.
LikeLike
Well, if you had bought property back in the 00s you will be worth millions today.
LikeLike
The new 100% digital ” virus” is called XEC, as to move to a digital currency the central bankers need people to be forced(“incentivized”) to get a digital ID.
Fear usually works to control humans, most of the ” you stole our future” Greta Generation are already digitized and drunk on political ideology.
LikeLike